Clasis law, with offices in Delhi and Mumbai, is a full service Indian law firm that is truly international in vision, scope, experience and capability. Being solutions oriented, the firm offers efficient, cost effective services of the highest quality and prides at providing practical and commercially relevant legal advice, combining specialist legal skills and industry experience, specific to the needs of the client. The firm advises domestic as well as international clients, ranging from Fortune 500 companies to individuals, across industry sectors on all aspects of Indian law.
The Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (Amendment) Bill, 2021 shall be deemed to have come into force on April 4, 2021. It amends the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016.
India Insolvency/Bankruptcy/Re-StructuringThe Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (Amendment) Bill, 2021 shall be deemed to have come into force on April 4, 2021. It amends the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016.
The object of the bill is to expedite and provide an efficient alternate insolvency resolution process for corporate persons classified as micro, small and medium enterprises (MSMEs) under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. The bill was introduced to replace The Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (Amendment) Ordinance, 2021 dated 04th April, 2021.
The bill was passed in the Lok Sabha on July 28, 2021 and in Rajya Sabha on August 03, 2021.
The minimum threshold for initiating Pre-packaged Insolvency Resolution Process ("PIRP") shall be wherein, default is not be less than INR 10 Lakhs and not more than INR 1 crore (Section 4).
(Section 11A) The Corporate Applicant may file an application under section 54C before the Adjudicating Authority (National Company Law Tribunal) for initiation of PIRP within 90 days of filing of an application under section 7, 9 of 10.
(Section 54A) The Corporate Debtor shall be eligible for initiation of PIRP provided:
Further, the Corporate Debtor is barred from making an application for initiation of PIRP wherein, resolution plan (under the PIRP) has been approved in the preceding twelve months from the date of making of the application (Section 4).
The Corporate Applicant alongwith the application shall furnish
An application for initiating PIRP may be made under section 54A in respect of the Corporate Debtor classified as MSMEs. Upon initiation of PIRP, the Resolution Professional shall constitute Committee of Creditors ("CoC") and conduct first CoC meeting with 7 days (Section 54I) from the PIRP commencement date.
Commencement of PIRP does not absolve the Board of Directors from the management of the Corporate Debtor. The Resolution Professional does not take over the management of the Corporate Debtor (section 54H).
PIRP shall be completed within a period of 120 days from the PIRP commencement date.
The Adjudicating Authority shall on the PIRP commencement date alongwith the order of admission shall declare moratorium for the purposes referred to in section 14(3)(1) of the code, which shall mutatis mutandis apply.
Powers of Resolution Professional in PIRP (Section 54F)
While in PIRP the Resolution Professional shall have access to:
Upon Application by the Resolution Professional, if the Adjudicating Authority is of the opinion that:
It shall pass an order vesting the management of the Corporate Debtor with the Resolution Professional (Section 54J).
If such an order is passed and the Adjudicating Authority is of the opinion that the PIRP is to be terminated, the Adjudicating Authority shall pass an order of liquidation and declare that the PIRP costs, if any, shall be included as part of the liquidation cost (Section 54L).
Appeal from an order of the Adjudicating Authority initiating Liquidation or Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process thereby terminating PIRP may be filed on grounds of material irregularity or fraud committed in relation to the orders.
The introduction of a PIRP mechanism is definitely a welcome move for the
MSME sector. It envisages a consensual process. A perusal of the amendment shows that the provisions of PIRP have been prioritized over CIRP mechanisms possibly because they seek to balance needs of creditors whilst protecting insolvent MSMEs inter alia from the economic ripple effect caused by Covid-19. The amendments seek to empower the Board of Director with the management of the Corporate Debtor. The success of the PIRP is likely to depend upon faster disposal of the Application as opposed to the severe backlog of the CIRP applications already checking the system.
The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.