Contracts often call for a termination right in cases of bankruptcy, but are such provisions enforceable? Rachel Albanese, a restructuring partner at DLA Piper, addressed this common misconception. Despite the widespread inclusion of termination clauses in contracts (allowing one party to terminate the agreement if the other faces insolvency or bankruptcy), Albanese reveals that these clauses are broadly unenforceable under the Bankruptcy Code. The fundamental aim behind this legal stance is to preserve the bankruptcy estate and ensure fair treatment among creditors, aligning with Chapter 11's goal of debtor rehabilitation. The creation of a bankruptcy estate upon a debtor's filing halts creditor actions against the debtor and its assets through an automatic stay. This measure prevents a "race to the courthouse," ensuring that creditors are treated equally. Furthermore, specific provisions in the Bankruptcy Code, such as Section 365(e), explicitly prohibit terminating a contract solely because of a debtor's bankruptcy or insolvency. This legal structure is crucial for protecting the debtor's assets and facilitating the successful rehabilitation of the debtor within the bankruptcy process. Despite the general unenforceability of these termination clauses in bankruptcy contexts, they continue to be standard in many contracts. Albanese suggests this persistence may stem from their routine inclusion in contractual templates and the possibility of enforceability outside bankruptcy proceedings. For parties reviewing their contracts, however, the assumption should be that such termination rights are broadly not enforceable in the event of a counterparty's bankruptcy or insolvency. Rachel Albanese is a Restructuring partner at DLA Piper.
Are COVID-19 Vaccine Mandates at Universit. With most schools planning a full return to campus in fall 2021 and COVID-19 cases on the rise again in pockets of th.
Can Hospital Workers Be Fired for Refusing. The first batch of COVID-19 vaccinations are already being administered to healthcare workers in hospitals and long-t.
Can lawyers lie in negotiations? Are lawyers permitted to lie in business negotiations on behalf of their clients? What about exaggerating, puffing, o.
Can lawyers use threats in a negotiation? Threats and other aggressive tactics can be an effective tool at times in negotiations. Legal ethics rules in some ju.
Can the President Overturn States' Quarant. In the thick of the COVID-19 national health emergency, President Trump has tweeted and stated on several occasions t.
Can You Sue If You Get Sick from the COVID. Are pharmaceutical companies or businesses that mandate employee vaccinations liable if someone gets sick from advers.
CARES Act Fraud and Whistleblower Protections With the disbursement of funds under the CARES Act, federal enforcement of one key law is expected to increase in the.
"Compassionate Use" and the Law on Unappro. President Trump has touted experimental drugs approved for other uses, like malaria and lupus, as a potential treatme.
COVID-19 Contract Defenses As states across the United States close non-essential businesses and countries around the world restrict their borde.
Crisis Management — the First 48hrs When a crisis erupts, the first 24 to 48 hours are critical for a company. The steps taken in those first hours may s.
Defining a "Data Breach" In the complex landscape of data privacy, state and federal laws regulating data breaches often present contrasting a.
Extraterritoriality–Prosecuting Crime Comm. American prosecutors have recently brought a number of high-profile criminal cases against foreign citizens abroad (E.
Federal and State COVID-19 Vaccination Man. As the COVID-19 pandemic continues to rage in parts of the United States, federal agencies, states, and municipalitie.
Forced Triage: Allocating Ventilators and . As the COVID-19 crisis deepens across the United States and its full impact yet to be realized, health care providers.
FTC Act Section 5 Unfairness Balancing Test The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) uses its authority under Section 5 of the FTC Act to enforce against unfair and de.
H-1B Visa Alternatives With a cap on the number of H-1B visas issued per year and applications exceeding the quota on any given year, most p.
How do NFT royalties work? One of the unique features of non-fungible tokens (NFTs) is the ability to distribute royalties from resales. When th.
Investment Treaty Protection for Tech Comp. Technology companies are increasingly the target of antitrust actions and regulatory interference by nations seeking .
Is COVID-19 a Force Majeure Event? With the World Health Organization declaring COVID-19 a pandemic on March 11, 2020, increased focus is on force majeu.
Legally, what makes PRIVATE EQUITY different? What is a private equity fund, and what makes "PE" funds different from other funds? Who can invest, and what are the.
Litigation Strategy: A Key to Winning In litigation, the attorney's role is to battle for their clients' victory, but what does it take to win at the highe.
Litigation Strategy: Identifying the Decis. In litigation, the attorney's role is to battle for their clients' victory, but what does it take to win at the highe.
Material Adverse Effects after COVID-19 The COVID-19 pandemic caused disruption in the M&A world, with deals being put on hold and many buyers attempting.
Money laundering for dummies What are the basics of money laundering, and when does moving money around constitute a crime? Get a quick and clear.
Ohio v. Amex In 2018, the U.S. Supreme Court handed down a decision in Ohio v. Amex that sent ripples through the antitrust world.
Private Equity Fundraising Mistakes In the multi-trillion dollar world of private equity and hedge funds, what are the rules that apply to raising capita.
Returning to the Office — Employer Legal L. Offices are reopening their doors after a year plus of interruptions, closures, and remote work during the COVID-19 p.
Returning to Work in a Pandemic For Companies and Private Funds In the early days of the COVID-19 pandemic, many companies and private funds shift.
Rights of Inmates in a Pandemic Prisons and jails have been some of the hardest hit places in the COVID-19 pandemic and are quickly becoming hotspots.
SEC 2022 Risk Alert for Private Funds On January 27, 2022, the SEC issued a risk alert (the "Risk Alert") detailing a number of deficiencies it observed in.
Selling COVID-19 Vaccine Priority Is Selling Vaccine Priority Legal? Over 5 million Americans have received their first doses of the COVID-19 vaccine .
SPACs – Trends and Structure after Tontine In the summer of 2020, Tontine, the largest ever special purpose acquisition company (SPAC), debuted on the NY Stock .
Standard Essential Patents Standards are necessary for wide adoption of technologies and to ensure interoperability. Mobile phones, for example.
State Laws Restricting Vaccine Mandates In the spring and summer of 2021, several states across the United States passed laws restricting COVID-19 vaccinatio.
The 2020 SEC Examination Priorities Releva. Each year, the SEC's Office of Compliance Inspections and Examinations (OCIE) releases a report outlining its examina.
The Failing Firm Defense With an influx of distressed companies as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, the “failing firm” defense has been attr.
The Poison Pill explained A “poison pill” is a defensive tactic used to discourage a hostile takeover. Professor John D. Morley of Yale Law Sch.
What Is Bankruptcy Mothballing? The COVID-19 virus and government shut-downs have triggered a historic wave of bankruptcies in the United States. Fa.
What is CFIUS? The Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS) is an interagency committee that assesses the potent.
What Is the H-1B Visa? The H-1B visa is one of the most popular visa categories for highly skilled workers holding bachelor’s degrees or hig.
Next PreviousThe Standard Termination on Bankruptcy Provision A common termination clause, often known as an ipso facto clause: This Agreement shall terminate, without notice, (i) upon the institution by or against either party of insolvency, receivership or bankruptcy proceedings or any other proceedings for the settlement of either party's debts, (ii) upon either party making an assignment for the benefit of creditors, or (iii) upon either party's dissolution or ceasing to do business. Why Are Termination on Bankruptcy Clauses Generally Unenforceable? 11 U.S.C. § 365(e) prohibits a creditor from terminating a contract because of a debtor’s bankruptcy or insolvency: Notwithstanding a provision in an executory contract or unexpired lease … may not be terminated or modified, and any right or obligation under such contract or lease may not be terminated or modified, at any time after the commencement of the case solely because of a provision in such contract or lease that is conditioned on— (A) the insolvency or financial condition of the debtor at any time before the closing of the case; (B) the commencement of a case under this title; or (C) the appointment of or taking possession by a trustee in a case under this title or a custodian before such commencement. The purpose of Chapter 11 is to rehabilitate the debtor and allow reorganization of its interests. “Once a debtor files for bankruptcy, it creates an estate, and all of the debtor’s property belongs to that estate,” Albanese explains. 11 U.S.C. § 541. The prohibition on termination rights gives the debtor reasonable opportunity to reorganize under Chapter 11 before that right can be exercised. What Is an Automatic Stay? A bankruptcy filing triggers an automatic stay which suspends all actions against the debtor. 11 U.S.C. § 362. The automatic stay gives debtors a breathing spell and prevents “a race to the courthouse,” blocking any one individual creditor from attempting to satisfy their claims at the expense of other creditors or the debtor's restructuring efforts. If Termination Provisions Are Largely Unenforceable, Why Are They Still Standard? While largely unenforceable, ipso facto clauses remain common in contracts. As Albanese points out, attorneys may be reluctant to alter the form of the precedent. Beyond sheer force of habit, termination for insolvency clauses are sometimes included because they may also be enforceable outside of bankruptcy or in agreements for complex financial contracts like loans, hedges, and derivatives. 11 U.S.C. § 365(e)(2) sets forth the exceptions: (2) Paragraph (1) of this subsection does not apply to an executory contract or unexpired lease of the debtor, whether or not such contract or lease prohibits or restricts assignment of rights or delegation of duties, if-- (A)(i) applicable law excuses a party, other than the debtor, to such contract or lease from accepting performance from or rendering performance to the trustee or to an assignee of such contract or lease, whether or not such contract or lease prohibits or restricts assignment of rights or delegation of duties; and (ii) such party does not consent to such assumption or assignment; or (B) such contract is a contract to make a loan, or extend other debt financing or financial accommodations, to or for the benefit of the debtor, or to issue a security of the debtor.
Joel Cohen (JC): In contract negotiations, attorneys regularly demand a termination right where the other party is facing insolvency or bankruptcy. As common as these provisions are, we were surprised to learn that they’re broadly unenforceable. Hello, and welcome to TalksOnLaw. I’m Joel Cohen. We’re joined remotely today by Rachel Albanese, a bankruptcy partner at the global law firm DLA Piper. Rachel, welcome to TalksOnLaw. Rachel Albanese (RA): Thank you. JC: Before we go on, what I said in the introduction, these provisions, they’re everywhere. Are they actually unenforceable? RA: Yeah, it’s surprising, but those provisions are generally unenforceable. JC: Maybe we can start with, what does the basic language in a contract look like for one of these termination rights? RA: It says that upon a party’s insolvency or bankruptcy or similar proceeding, that the other party can terminate the contract. JC: What is the law trying to accomplish by interfering with individuals’ abilities to negotiate? RA: It goes to the creation of the bankruptcy estate upon a debtor’s filing for bankruptcy. So once a debtor files for bankruptcy, it creates an estate, and all of the debtor’s property belongs to that estate. The goal of Chapter 11 is to rehabilitate the debtor, and the debtor needs its property to accomplish that goal. So upon the filing, Congress has said that there’s an automatic imposition of a stay of creditor action against the debtor and its property, and we call that the automatic stay. JC: What’s the purpose for the automatic stay? RA: The automatic stay is meant to prevent what we call a “race to the courthouse.” And that is to ensure that all similarly situated creditors get treated equally with respect to the priority of their claims against the debtor. And so it essentially ensures equal treatment of creditors; It gives the debtors a breathing spell, which is very important, and oftentimes one of the primary reasons for a filing. JC: The stay slows everything down. Is that also what invalidates these termination rights? RA: There’s a separate provision of the bankruptcy code, 365e, which prohibits a counter party from terminating a contract simply because of a debtor’s bankruptcy or insolvency. JC: Rachel, are there any exceptions where these termination rights can actually be enforced? RA: Yes, there are a handful of exceptions. One is where applicable non-bankruptcy law permits it, one is if it’s a contract to make a loan or a financial accommodation, and one is, for example, with complex financial contracts such as hedges, derivatives, forward contracts and the like. JC: So these provisions are largely unenforceable. You mentioned some exceptions. Why are they still being drafted in contract over contract? RA: That’s a good question. I think it’s partly because this provision is a standard provision in many contracts and lawyers may be reluctant to alter the form of the precedent, but also potentially because it may be enforceable outside of a bankruptcy proceeding. JC: So before we let you go, advice to those who are reviewing their contracts and wondering if their termination rights are in fact enforceable. RA: Well, first I would say call a bankruptcy lawyer. But the default assumption should be that the contract termination right is not enforceable upon a counterparty’s bankruptcy or insolvency. JC: Rachel Albanese, thank you for joining us today and explaining this myth of a termination right where the other party is facing insolvency or bankruptcy. RA: Thank you, it was my pleasure to join you at TalksOnLaw.
